Sex differentiation in plants. Terms and notions

Volume 68, N 2. 2007 pp. 98–108

V. N. Godin

Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences ul. Zolotodolinskaya, 101, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
e-mail: godin@ngs.ru

There are two methodological approaches to the study of sex in plants: the descriptive and morphological approach and the quantitative approach. The former is based exclusively on external morphological peculiarities of the generative organs of the flower, the latter is based on the functioning of individuals as parents of the coming generation. It has been suggested to recognize three flower types: staminate, pistillate, and complete. Depending on the distribution partem of the flowers of different sex type, there are monomorphic populations (all individuals form flowers of the same type) and heteromorphic populations (individuals have flowers of different types). Monomorphic populations include monoclinous, monoecious, gynomonoecious, andromonoecious, and polygamomonoecious ones. Among heteromorphic populations, dioecious, polygamodioecious, subdioecious, paradioecious, and trioecious ones are recognized. It is desirable to give up the usage of such terms as "bisexual", "polygamous", "functionally female", and "functionally male" flowers, "temporary dioecy" and some others. The notion "gender" has been established in English-language works for describing the sex quantitavely; two additional terms have been proposed: "phenotypic gender" and "functional gender". The recently developed quantitative approach is at present in the process of accumulating material, and in need of the further elaborating the methodological base for research. Analysis of the principal notions shows the necessity to form their integrated structure and to correct the usage of the existing and new terms.


Элементы

© 2005–2025 «Элементы»